This pull request passes (merged d1f59b5 into 6b03b51).

Doing a fly-by pass on this PR...is this still relevant?

This is absolutely something we need to do, except it may be even more involved now, because of all the changes upstream.

@Vagabond Time for some belated repo curating ... is there any plan to fix this for Riak 2.0?

I know you're busy, Andrew, but ... re-ping?

Setting milestone to 2.1 since it's something we absolutely need to do but too late for 2.0.

leaving at milestone 2.1

@seancribbs is this change still necessary? If so, what do we do about our branch of poolboy? Update ours to latest?

Run the quickcheck tests again, make sure things are still good and update, yeah.

IIRC, some of the poolboy changes caused a minor problem with the EQC tests around worker exits, but I think it was a cosmetic problem, not a property violation. Make sure you run a lot of iterations of the tests.

FYI - this PR is superseded by #639.